Amendment No. 1, Dated February 7,
2008 To Requests for Proposal (RFP) No. AHRQ-08-10009, issued January
18, 2008
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) Medical Provider Component (MPC) Support
Proposal Due March 13, 2008, 12 Noon EST
Notice of Intent Due February 15, 2008
Question 1: What assumptions can be
made about the format of materials received from the MEPS HC contractor related
to medical providers identified in the household interviews? Will these be
paper records or electronic or a combination?
Response 1:
There will be a combination of paper, electronic, and scanned materials received
from the MEPS HC contractor. Examples of these types of materials are
authorization forms and electronic files which include matching variables that
allow persons to be linked to their medical providers.
Question 2:
The RFP refers to an Option Period 3 but does not specifically request the
Offeror to include Option Period 3 in the technical proposal. Specifically, on
page 92, the RFP states that the "Option Periods should mirror the person loading
chart for the base period proposal, reflecting the incremental cost of option
Period 1, given the base period award and then the incremental cost of option
Period 2, given the award of option period 1". Should Offeror's also reflect
the incremental cost of option Period 3, given the award of option period 2?
Response 2:
Yes, Offerors should also include the incremental cost of option period 3,
given the award of option period 2 in their technical proposal.
Question 3: RFP page 43, F.2, shows
a PoP [Period of Performance] base of 42 months, each option period as 42 months, and a total base and
option PoP of 80 months. RFP page 6, B.2 & B.3 show a base PoP of 44
months and three 36 month option periods. Should the offeror assume a base
period of 44 months, and three 12 month option periods for a total of 80
months? Please confirm or clarify.
Response 3:
RFP page 6, B.2 and B.3 state the Base Period of Performance incorrectly.
The Base Period of Performance is 42 months. There are also three
36-month options. If all of the options are exercised, the total period of
performance may be 150 months. It is anticipated, however, that the base
period of performance and the option periods will partially run concurrently, the
total elapsed time of the Base Period of Performance and option periods is 80
months. Option Period 1 may be exercised anytime after completion of the first
year of the Base Period. It is anticipated that Option Period 2 shall be
exercised around July/August 2010. It is anticipated that Option Period 3
shall be exercised around July/August 2011.
Question 4:
Section 4.4 of the RFP refers to a "data line" that the contractor will
establish. Please provide details on the type of data line envisioned.
Response 4: AHRQ will
provide (and will continue to own) a dedicated stand alone machine that resides
at the contractor's work place and dials into the Secure LAN at AHRQ. The
contractor will need a dedicated phone line and a signed Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) stating the machine AHRQ provides will never be connected
to any network (internet/intranet); the machine will only dial up to an AHRQ
specified number to support data transfers. There will be substantial
penalties for any failures or breeches of security.
Question 5: Will the Household
Component [HC] contractor provide a variable that classifies household data into
Medicaid, Managed Care, and Other categories for the purpose of MPC sample
selection?
Response 5:
The sample provided to the MPC contractor from the HC contractor will already
have been subsampled. The MPC subsampling is built into the HC CAPI
instrument.
Question 6:
Section H.1 of the RFP states that evaluation will be conducted semiannually.
Section L.7.a states that evaluation will be conducted annually. With what
frequency will award evaluation be conducted?
Response 6:
The evaluation will be conducted annually. Section H.1 of the RFP is
hereby corrected to state evaluations will be conducted annually.
Question 7:
Will the contractor be responsible for the conduct of IRB [Institutional Review Board ] review discussed in
4.3.1.5?
Response 7:
Yes.
Question 8: Will the provider
directory (Section 4.2.3) maintained by the incumbent be provided to the
contractor before data collection?
Response 8:
Yes, after award of the contract, the MPC provider directory maintained by the
incumbent will be provided to the contractor awarded the contract.
Question 9: Please provide any
available data about length of telephone surveys by instrument type.
Response 9:
For the MPC 2005 data collection the average length of time for a telephone
interview by provider type were:
| Provider Type
| Interview
Hours |
Pairs |
Hours
per Paid |
OBD |
33,064 |
18,592 |
1.78 |
Hospital |
41,595 |
11,007 |
3.78 |
Home
Health |
1,686 |
505 |
3.34 |
Pharmacy |
3,536 |
12,914 |
0.27 |
SDB |
39,873 |
15,416 |
2.59 |
For more
information on average length of time of MPC activities including abstraction,
please refer to the MEPS Medical Provider Component Annual Methodology
Report that is available on CD-ROM only by making a request by E-mail to
Mary Haines, Contracting Officer at Mary.Haines@ahrq.hhs.gov.
Please reference Solicitation Number/RFP Number in written requests. Telephone
requests will not be honored.
Current as of February 2008
Internet Citation:
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Medical Provider Component (MPC) Support: Requests for Proposal, Amendment 1. February 2008. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/contract/0810009am1.htm