Your browser doesn't support JavaScript. Please upgrade to a modern browser or enable JavaScript in your existing browser.
Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
www.ahrq.gov

Table 6.4. Suggested Improvements to Service Supporting the AHRQ QIs

Number (percent) of interviewees making the recommendation Recommendation
10 (19%) Provide a template and guidance for using the QIs for public reporting
10 (19%) Provide guidance on next steps for improving quality once a potential opportunity for improvement is flagged by the QIs
8 (15%) Collaborate with other organizations to create a national standard set of measures
8 (15%) Make QIs more user-friendly (such as simpler indicator names)
7 (13%) Increase responsiveness and speed of user support
6 (11%) Expand outreach and marketing to more people and more audiences
6 (11%) Provide guidance for how consumers should interpret values of QIs
5 (9%) Provide benchmark QI values for various populations
4 (7%) Add a greater educational component to outreach and user support
4 (7%) Develop a comprehensive list of who is using the QIs, how they are using them, and impact they are having
4 (7%) Provide funding for research studies using the QIs
3 (6%) Improve the process of incorporating feedback from users on the QIs
3 (6%) Provide guidance on how coding of discharge data can be improved
2 (4%) Choose 1 statistical software package (SAS or SPSS) and drop the other; also drop/cut back on the PC application
2 (4%) Contract with other organizations to provide outreach, education, user support, and to disseminate information
2 (4%) Make the Fact book series more accessible
1 (2%) AHRQ staff should do communication and relationship-building directly with state agencies rather than using a contractor
1 (2%) Develop basic educational materials appropriate for local/hospital level (QI director) rather than a researcher, who is already familiar with material, and disseminate them widely
1 (2%) Develop something like the Dartmouth Atlas charts showing geographic variations in QIs – would help choose which QIs to report
1 (2%) Make formulas easier to access – some formulas are buried in documents and SAS code and some are missing from documentation
1 (2%) Provide code for STATA
1 (2%) Provide FAQs, list of questions already answered, for quick reference
1 (2%) Provide outreach to promote use of PQIs
1 (2%) Provide print outreach materials, not just email
1 (2%) Provide software for Macintosh computers
1 (2%) Standardize the layout/organization of documentation across measure sets

Source: RAND analysis of interview responses.

Return to Document

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care